cross icon
blog image
0 Comments

Bruxism and Posterior Restorations: Choosing the Right Solutions for Long-lasting Dental Health

Solventum

22 days ago

The Challenges of Bruxism

Bruxism can create excessive masticatory forces that jeopardize posterior occlusal restorations. For patients seeking treatment, the constant strain may result in the very damage that necessitates these restorations in the first place. A notable study revealed that the maximum bite force during bruxism episodes can reach as high as 1,100N—surpassing even the strongest voluntary bite force. Although these forces may not be exerted for long periods, the risks associated with recurring bruxism are significant, warranting careful consideration during restoration planning.

 

Solutions for Posterior Dentition

Bruxism poses various threats, including occlusal trauma and periodontal tissue breakdown. When the surface of posterior teeth is eroded, it is vital for clinicians to suggest effective restorative solutions that can replace the lost tooth structure. The options are diverse:

 

1.Resin Composites: Often hailed as the first choice for posterior tooth restoration, resin composites offer versatility and a minimally invasive approach. However, some clinicians express concerns regarding the aesthetics and durability of direct composite solutions—paramount for bruxism patients. Selecting the right resin composite is crucial for achieving long-lasting outcomes.

2.Ceramic Reconstructions: These restorations are favored for their aesthetic appeal. Zirconia ceramics, in particular, have gained popularity due to their strength and durability. However, full crowns can be invasive, requiring the removal of up to 75.6% of the original tooth structure.

3.Occlusal Veneers: In cases of less severe attrition, occlusal veneers may be a viable solution. These thin restorations (as little as 0.3mm) can withstand masticatory stress while maintaining aesthetics and facilitating conservative tooth preparation. However, they demand high technical skill and can present fitting challenges.

Each treatment option has its advantages, and the choice of material should be tailored to the unique needs of the patient, considering factors such as the extent of damage, bruxism severity, and aesthetic preferences.

 

Planning for Future Restorations

For patients with bruxism, it is essential for clinicians to account for the potential for future dental damage. While stopping bruxism would eliminate the need for careful planning, this goal may not be immediately attainable. Strategies for managing bruxism may include:

 

Occlusal Adjustments and Oral Rehabilitation

Elimination of Contributing Factors (such as smoking, alcohol, and caffeine)

Psychological Interventions (including relaxation techniques and psychotherapy)

Given the individual nature of every patient’s condition, a straightforward solution may not be available. Therefore, clinicians should approach initial restorations with the foresight of potential future repairs in mind. Additive techniques are generally preferred over more invasive options, such as ceramic crowns, which should not be the first line of treatment for posterior restorations. Resin composites, known for their capacity for minimally invasive repairs, show promise in enhancing the longevity of restorations in posterior teeth.

 

Meeting Modern Demands

While functionality and repairability are critical from a clinical perspective, patient expectations are evolving. With the rise of social media, many patients prioritize aesthetic results in their dental restorations. Bruxism often places undue stress on posterior restorations, leading some patients to believe they must compromise on appearance for functionality. This doesn't have to be the case.

The award-winning 3M™ Filtek™ One Bulk Fill Restorative. is designed to bridge the gap between aesthetics and durability in posterior restorations. This innovative solution combines aesthetic brilliance, clinical simplicity, and exceptional wear resistance, making it suitable for various treatment indications. The use of AFM and AUDMA monomers reduces shrinkage and stress within the restoration, enhancing overall performance.

 

Bruxism patients are likely to require several posterior restorations throughout their lives, particularly if their grinding habits persist. Therefore, selecting the appropriate solution for each case while balancing modern treatment demands and the possibility of future repairs is vital for successful outcomes.

 

Buy now on Zooz: 

https://dental.zooz.ae/product-details/MGD-4870A1-CO 

https://dental.zooz.ae/product-details/MGD-4871A1-CO 

Leave a Comment